The Social Graph

Maciej Ceglowski on the social graph:

Social networks exist to sell you crap. The icky feeling you get when your friend starts to talk to you about Amway, or when you spot someone passing out business cards at a birthday party, is the entire driving force behind a site like Facebook.

Because their collection methods are kind of primitive, these sites have to coax you into doing as much of your social interaction as possible while logged in, so they can see it. It’s as if an ad agency built a nationwide chain of pubs and night clubs in the hopes that people would spend all their time there, rigging the place with microphones and cameras to keep abreast of the latest trends (and staffing it, of course, with that Mormon bartender).

Probably the best thing I’ve read all year on the web.

Bravo Tango Hiring

Local agency Bravo Tango™ is looking for an Interactive Developer. If this kid was looking to join an agency, this is the job he’d want. The usual requirements; HTML, CSS, JS, PHP & MySQL. Awesome opportunity to work with some of the nicest, coolest people I know with business ethics I can get behind. Submissions end on Nov. 20th so get ‘em in there.

Social Animals

People are social creatures. Since birth you have presumably been interacting with the people around you, bonding first with your Mother and then developing relationships with the people around you through the course of your life. This behaviour isn’t limited to humans either. Birds do it, bees do it, an argument could even be made that trees do it. It’s our nature and it’s also the reason that Social Media has taken off as it has. It’s an extension of the things we do every day.

If ‘social’ is in our nature, why does it feel like there are so many people offering to help us or our businesses socialize online? I think part of the answer to that is due to the technological age of the services. If the web has just taken the training wheels off, social sites are still in diapers. New services beget new services and there’s no shortage of good-intentioned people willing to offer advice on how to ‘get on the new train and ride’.

I won’t speak in absolutes here but it seems to me that if we can agree that people are social animals and have been since birth, there is no reason to believe that a business’s approach to Social Media should be different from what they already know. Social Media best practice seems to assert that you should follow the social norms that we already abide. If someone is talking to you, listen and respond. If someone is looking for help, offer your assistance. As far as I can tell, these are the two most common bits of advice offered up. It isn’t magic, it’s common sense. Be ‘social’.

Here’s an interesting thought though. Google’s on Twitter (3,737,560 followers of @google), but they don’t talk to anyone. There is no back and forth on their channel, only output. Apple’s on Twitter by way of @iTunesMusic (1,328,172 followers as of this post) and follows much the same practice, only retweeting artists and pushing promotions or new releases. There is no conversation here. And here’s the thing, that’s all most would want from them. Twitter is not a support channel for Apple or Google, it’s a promotion channel and there is nothing wrong with that. There is no reason to say either are doing it wrong though to listen to some, they are doing everything wrong.

The important thing to realize here is that because of Social Media’s infancy, there are no right or wrong answers. There is no best practice outside of what you, the social animal, already know. All the other stuff is still being learned as ‘we’ go along. You are already on the new train because it’s the same as the old train. If your business is on Twitter or Facebook and you don’t know how to interact with your customers there, you probably don’t need a ‘Social Media Expert’, you more likely need a psychiatrist.

As a rule

As a rule, design that aims to resolve the business needs of clients isn’t solved by clicking a Buy Now button. To approach your practice in conflict with this very basic principle exhibits both a great misunderstanding of the role of design and an incomplete appreciation of the skill set of your peers. As designers, it is our responsibility to demonstrate the value of the work we do which is made more difficult when there are those who would provide services at cost which conflict with this tenet. Just my two cents.

Thoughts on Responsive Web Design

Luke Jones provides an argument against responsive web design and the comments heat up.

I’m cautiously optimistic for a future where responsive designs can take the place of serving multiple stylesheets for different platforms. Seems worthwhile and the forthcoming Happy Camper site adheres to the principle (go ahead and resize your browser window smaller here). While it works for me and I can see it working for most of the projects I’ll handle, I can see how it may not be beneficial for others. Over the brief existence of responsive design, it’s already proven itself pretty divisive but being the fella I am and growing up in the times I did, I’ll fall back to words of a very wise man who sums up what should be the standard perception of the practice.

Principles

Jeremy Keith’s Design Principles. Goes well with a dose of Whitney Hess’ Philosophy of UX. I saw Whitney give this presentation at Interlink and it really opened my eyes to a different way of thinking about designing for the web. Responsive design, grids and CSS3 are all well and good things to discuss but to my mind this is real ‘grow as a designer’ stuff.

10 Amazing SEO Tips You Need To Use

Obviously the above is a joke but over on Poynter, Jim Romenesko contrasts three views on SEO and the death of the clever headline. All of the linked articles are worth the read but there’s a quote in David Wheeler’s Atlantic article from Ian Lurie that rung out to me:

Readers need more information when they’re browsing content on the Web—it’s a fact. Depriving readers of valuable information in an effort to make them click will backfire every time.

Fair enough, but look; Google is a dumb beast, people aren’t. Good content will always drive traffic because it’s linked to; not because it’s first in a list. You see this every day on Twitter as the people you follow (forgive me) curate what you read. Quality and delight should be job one because you want to bring people back and have them explore not just drop them on a page then send them on their way.