http://www.signalresponse.com/2008/06/well-would-you-look-at-that/ just a bunch of useless junk. Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:06:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 http://www.signalresponse.com/2008/06/well-would-you-look-at-that/comment-page-1/#comment-1194 Wade Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:46:51 +0000 http://www.signalresponse.com/?p=399#comment-1194 That's awesome. She's always been the best in the city. I don't know how competent she is in web, I assume most of that gets farmed out to someone not so good since the source on that site is combo Image Ready (which I thought didn't exist any more) and Dreamweaver template pages. But outside of it not being very accessible and being a table design, it's fine. That’s awesome. She’s always been the best in the city. I don’t know how competent she is in web, I assume most of that gets farmed out to someone not so good since the source on that site is combo Image Ready (which I thought didn’t exist any more) and Dreamweaver template pages. But outside of it not being very accessible and being a table design, it’s fine.

]]> http://www.signalresponse.com/2008/06/well-would-you-look-at-that/comment-page-1/#comment-1193 regan Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:37:28 +0000 http://www.signalresponse.com/?p=399#comment-1193 i guess you won't mind then if this is who's redoing the "company" website/brand(?). it's not really re-branding yet. i'm getting there. i guess you won’t mind then if this is who’s redoing the “company” website/brand(?). it’s not really re-branding yet. i’m getting there.

]]> http://www.signalresponse.com/2008/06/well-would-you-look-at-that/comment-page-1/#comment-1192 jeff Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:02:13 +0000 http://www.signalresponse.com/?p=399#comment-1192 the work is not bad at all. the site is a little all over the place but not bad as well. the work is not bad at all. the site is a little all over the place but not bad as well.

]]>